They Made A Desert, And Called It Peace
"Among free men, there can be no successful appeal from the ballot to the bullet; and those who take such appeal are sure to lose their cause and pay the costs." -Abraham Lincoln
Perhaps to its detriment, this blog has never had a stated purpose or intent to its content. I often restrain from using it as a political booth, or religious grand stand, or personal opinion box. Rather, if there is any intent, be it subconscious or purposeful, this intent is most likely a celebration of life and timeline of the events I, and others, share in the sphere in which we find ourselves. Today though, I am hard pressed as I see before me a dangerous road that, whether directly or indirectly, shapes the destiny of all of us, even if we are unwilling to acknowledge the changes already set in motion. Lately, in many conversations I have had, the issue of our government's present course of action is mentioned...sadly, I confess to the inadequacy of my citizenship, at my lack of knowledge, even at my lack of interest and sympathy to these events. However, we cannot allow the ill made decisions of our past dictate a continuation of ill decisions in our future. I've tried to think long and hard at this issue of violence, and war, and inevitable suffering. There is suffering in the world, that is clear, whether it is on a large scale, affecting all of mankind, or on the day to day scale affecting only our moods - there is suffering. Deciphering the meaning of this suffering is meaningful, but it is not my intent today, rather I acknowledge that suffering is real, and it is always present. I would focus my intention not on what the meaning of suffering is but that our current suffering is meaningful. On the meaning of suffering I can only offer this, "God, whose law it is that he who learns must suffer. And even in our sleep pain that cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart, and in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God." Pretending to understand war, or the suffering that accompanies such events is beyond me and in the truest sense, arrogant, foolish, and plain cruel to comment on the effects of those who do suffer. Nonetheless, feeling some sense of suffering I understand and can say that if we are to purposely suffer, I think it is vital, yes even mandatory, to ask the meaning of our suffering. In World War II I believe most men and women would think themselves sufferers, but would also express the need to place themselves upon the pedestal of suffering. Their cause was for a cause bigger than themselves, and while not all the details were immensely clear, they understood the greater good only came through their suffering.
It is my belief that man will suffer but even greater than this that man will choose suffering for in it he understands that only through his own suffering does he lessen the current and future suffering of his fellow man. In this kind of suffering, this giving of oneself for a clear and necessary good, men will judge their own hearts and motivations for entering into suffering, and, my belief, will accept the suffering through the Grace of God, and none of us should think that the suffering is easy, or does not even cause horrid tortures upon the soul. The kind of suffering I see before us does not fit into this category. The kind of suffering I see before us is not one where man can clearly judge the heart. The suffering I see before us is one that is not even clear in meaning. I do believe that in some eternal sense the suffering that is happening will be redeemed for some greater good, but there is suffering that cannot be redeemed... rather the individuals who created the suffering must understand that the burden of suffering they cause will be heavily ladened upon them in their own lives. I fear for this kind of suffering, the kind whose meaning is unclear, for possibly hidden behind this suffering are evils we cannot fathom, and can only so long endure. Man will only so long suffer when the suffering has no greater meaning for our society. That is the suffering I see before us today. I fear for this present course, I fear for the future it brings before us, I fear for the people we ought to become because of it, I fear for the world we pass on after it. "Civilizations come and go. Great powers used to survive at the crest of their wave for several centuries. Now we will be lucky to have several generations where our power can make the difference in helping the world survive. And here we are - throwing our men, our dreams, our power into the [desert], and no one will ever understand why we did it." It is tough for me to believe that one man or woman can change a world which "yields most painfully to change," yet it is said that "many of the world's great movements, of thought and action, have flowed from the work of a single man. A young monk began the Protestant reformation, a young general extended an empire from Macedonia to the borders of the earth, and a young woman reclaimed the territory of France. It was a young Italian explorer who discovered the New World, and the thirty-two-year-old Thomas Jefferson who proclaimed that all men are created equal." Today I am not writing to give solutions to the problem, for I have none and admit I am a man who does not know all the details, for that is part of what makes the suffering meaningless, and so the possible solutions elude me for lack of knowledge and to this day, lack of sympathy, but I urge you to take my stance of saying, no more. The world can no longer endure this motivation of suffering. Violence just breeds more violence and someone must say, no more. For what society can live in a world controlled by fear? What generation can pass on a world where freedom is exhibited through the shrouds of death? I see the confrontation before us and in the end I do see peace, sadly I see peace, for it will be said of the United States, "They made a desert, and called it peace." Whether it happens during this President's role or the next, we as a society must take a new course, for this one, like Vietnam, have failed us at too great a cost. In time we will judge ourselves and the world we pass down to the generations to come - the vision of this future is bright, but we must take control of it now and begin to raise again our ideals, our traditions, and our hopes - it is a delusion to think peace comes from domination, it is my belief that peace can only grow, it cannot be forced, and it is only grown through cooperation, strength, and love. The love that is loyalty, hope, creativity, order, respect for life, encouragement, and support. Only working together can we hope to change our world, which, in time, will affect even our daily lives - even if it does not affect them now. Mr. President, find a way to end this war...if not for our sake, or the sake of the children who suffer, then for the sake of your own heart and the desert you are creating there.
6 Comments:
Tyler honey... you know I agree with you totally.. what the hell set you off on this subject?
love,
mom
We have serious problems and we need solve them. I think that the only way to overcome the problems we have in the middle east is to just stop and close the borders of the US and not aid people in their time of need like we have in the past and are still doing. This will solve some problems because everyone hates the US and will continue too. But the thing about this is that no matter what we do if we were to aid others they would just say we are to controling and the US is so awful and are trying to take over the world. WELL THEN STOP ASKING US FOR HELP!!!! Its awful to see the we lay our lives on the line for people who hate us when they wouldnt do the same for us. Its sad that the world has come to this brainwashed society of the United States is evil and they do nothing but screw things up when all we want to do is help well I say stop helping because the world doesnt want it anyway. Only do bussiness with the countries we need to do business with and worry about the environment around us and stop this madness. Either that or we just need to be like Canada and Australia no one ever hears from them.
I think living in a free society does not offer the ability to just close our borders. I think it is blinded to believe the founders of this country could not imagine a time when our borders would be this hard pressed but I think it is foolish to also see them envisioning it. These are indeed difficult times and while I do think a measure of pulling out military engagement and re-engaging in the political arena is vital at this point....I do think we need to renegotiate how we interact on a global level. To simply close our borders will not solve much.
"Through no virtues and accomplishments of
our own, we have been fortunate enough to be born in the United States under the most comfortable conditions. We, therefore, have a responsibility to others who are less well off." I truly feel this is the endeavor of this country and specifically this generation - to discover what this responsibility means....on the other hand of it all I do see a lack of ownership and care in the problems we have right in our own country. One major thing I believe we need to begin doing is stop being managers and start being enablers. We need to enable ourselves to solve our problems apart from the central government, communities involving itself in solving its problems, and on a global level we need to enable countries to help themselves rather than attempting to come in and manage their problems
America is not beyond difficult times, for in our past and future lie difficult times but we have the power, hope, and creativity to confront those problems by working together...."Our future may lie beyond our vision, but it is not completely beyond our control. It is the
shaping impulse of America that neither fate nor nature nor the irresistible tides of history, but the work of our own hands, matched to reason and principle, that will determine our destiny. There is pride in that, even arrogance, but there is also experience and truth. In any
event, it is the only way we can live."
Ty, I think you have good thoughts. In response to this thought... "but I urge you to take my stance of saying, no more. The world can no longer endure this motivation of suffering. Violence just breeds more violence and someone must say, no more."...
I offer this question. Is that not what we did when we took Saddam out of power? He was maliciously and intentionally causing hundreds of thousands to suffer, thousands more, perhaps millions, died under his judgement. In the act that forced him from power, was not the US standing up and saying, "No more!"
I agree with you that the situation there is not a good one. It can be argued that the US is to blame for lack of control the leaders of the country now have, as well as the dramatic increase in casualities of civilians of all decent; not just one. (For Saddam targeted his venge to one sector of people while innocent civilians who claimed loyalty to him were left unharmed.)
However, it is my belief that we went there with the intent to help. Regardless of the alleged terror ties, regardless of of the oil, there were a mass of people at the mercy of an unmerciful, callous murderer and the leadership of the US saw it fit to at least try to put an end to it. Others will argue that point as well, however that is my belief. Unfortunately, the plan didn't work quite as well as was intentioned. I'm not sure if anyone would have predicted this sort of backlash within the Iraqi people which would cause them to turn on each other in ways greater than had been seen before. In stead of one man turning on the country, the country has now turned on each other. I think had the "best case scenario" played out, George Bush would be lauded as a visionary, a hero of sorts, for removing this cruel tyrant from power. Had the best case scenario worked out, Iraq would be a country to make each of us proud.
Knowing now that such is not the case, was it still wrong to risk the worst case scenario (which is what we're seeing played out now) to remove Saddam from power? New audio tapes released today prove that Saddam would stop at nothing to kill the greatest quantity of people in the easiest ways.
In a rather bold move, allow me for just a moment to compare Saddam to Hitler. Each was a man driven by pride and an elitists mentality. Each saw a particular group of people as lower than life itself, a group who was not worthy of depleting our oxygen. Each went to great lenghts to remove this group from the planet. Because Saddam, for the most part, contained his brutality to one country, how is it any less wrong? What would have happened had someone stepped in and stopped Hitler long before the attack on Pearl Harbor?
I know that is a rash comparison, however, I think the truth in the similarities behind the underlying situation cannot be denied. The difference lay, however, in the cultures of the defeated dictators. The Iraqi people, by history, have been defined as exceedingly more violent than the Germans or Austrians. And that is why, I believe, we are seeing the results of essentially similar situations played out in such drastically different manners.
Those are just my thoughts. I, like you, am very uneducated on the situation, the decisions, and the ramifications of the situation in Iraq. So, essentially, everything I just said may be complete hogwash. However, at this moment, what I do know has led to me believe the things stated above. Take it or leave it. I also am intentionally posting as anonymous as this is such a sensitive subject that I don't want people tracking me down to argue with me!
In other news, I told Gleave last night that you were trying to get me to move to Boston. He will have none of it and claims that he can get me "better hookups" on my future as a worship leader than you. I do think, though, that he's pullin' for you to come back to the good 'ole midwest. You two must have really hit it off during that game of shuffleboard!!
later
I like your spin and thought process on this topic. The introduction reminds me of those who chose suffering and saw ahead to The reward...
Hebrews 11 1Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see. 2This is what the ancients were commended for. 3By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible. 4By faith Abel...32And what more shall I say? I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, Samuel and the prophets, 33who through faith conquered kingdoms, administered justice, and gained what was promised; who shut the mouths of lions, 34quenched the fury of the flames, and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies. 35Women received back their dead, raised to life again. Others were tortured and refused to be released, so that they might gain a better resurrection. 36Some faced jeers and flogging, while still others were chained and put in prison. 37They were stoned[f]; they were sawed in two; they were put to death by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated— 38the world was not worthy of them. They wandered in deserts and mountains, and in caves and holes in the ground.
39These were all commended for their faith, yet none of them received what had been promised.
40God had planned something better for us so that only together with us would they be made perfect.(!!!)
I don't consider the US a Christian nation. And unless we ever decide to be a country that proclaims, reflects, and grows in the PEACE of Christ, the creative and divine (humble and servant-hearted) solutions of war elude us. Take a listen to Rob Bell's short, Christmas season sermon series--Calling All Peacemakers.
Hmmm...and in question of the last qoute in the last comment, how can we proceed without a vision? This to me would be the single unifying element. Though the details may be unclear (just hazy enough that the steps we take are steps of FAITH), a well considered approach and action plan (in light of the vision) are quite necessary...and there is no pride and arrogance in the way of Christ.
Not all of these are worth reading but they're interestind points of view nonetheless. I have thoughts on the comments made - I'll respond after some more time to think about what has been said
http://www.beliefnet.com/blogs/godspolitics/2007/01/brian-mclaren-how-does-saddams.html
http://www.beliefnet.com/blogs/godspolitics/2007/01/jim-wallis-more-revenge-than-justice.html
http://www.beliefnet.com/blogs/godspolitics/2007/01/shane-claiborne-communicating-through.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/dixon06172004.html
http://www.beliefnet.com/blogs/godspolitics/
Post a Comment
<< Home